Art and Identity: The Museum of Modern Art (field trip #1)

       Visiting the infamous, Museum of Modern Art, also known as the MoMA, was an inspirational and pleasurable experience. I’ve had the opportunity to witness various famous artists who created Art in all types of ways, you can’t imagine. Each works of art that I’ve witnessed had a personal meaning to the artist that the artist communicated through his or her work. On our trip to the MoMA, we were asked to find works of Art that embodied Individual, cultural and historical identity. Identity is what defines us, and makes someone or something unique. Identity separates one.

            The first work of art that I’d like to talk about, is the painting by Takashi Murakami called “727.”  In this work of art Murakami embodied individual identity. He uses synthetic polymer paint on his three canvas boards to create an image that appeals to his childhood. In his work we witness bright colors and animated creatures. The work of art is imaginary and the viewer gets a sense of what it was like to be a child again. It short of reminds one of the stickers they used to place on the back of their notebooks in elementary. This piece brings out the child in us which is why it symbolizes individual identity.

The second work of art that I’ll discuss is “R.S.V.P.” by, Senga Nengudi.  In this work of art Nengudi embodies cultural identity. In the 1960’s, feminist theory and practice profoundly informed the work of wide variety of women artist, such as Nengudi. In order to voice their opinions, artists confronted the cultural stereotypes, racial and gender inequities through different mediums. Nengudi used pantyhose and sand voice her opinions artistically meaning, “The body can only stand so much push and pull until it gives way, never to resume is orginal shape.”

In Emiliano Zapata’s “Agrarian Leader Zapata,” he embodied the historical identity. Emiliano Zapata, a champion of agrarian reform and key protagonist in the Mexican Revolution, here leads a band of peasant rebels armed with weapons.  Zapata was considered a hero and was glorified the victory of the Revolution in image of violent but just vengeance.   

In conclusion, the experience at the MoMA was phenomenal. I’ve witnessed so many types of works the embodied identity in different form. I was able to really analyze and appreciate art and its interior meaning.  

Narrative Digital Collage

This scene that I created is my perspective on how I interpret the concept of living in New York City.

Basically, New York City is a "Jungle." Because New York is the place of so many possible opportunities and success (such as acting, singing, directing, modeling, banking, artist & ect. jobs)  It is full of competition, ambition, and determination.  This then forces people to go about achieving their personal goals in either a good, or bad way . Just like the wild animals in a jungle, "New-Yorkers" have to protect themselves from being another "New-Yorkers" "prey." Its survival of the fittest. Protect your own. 

Good Art vs. Bad Art

Air & Space

To me "good art," is art that evokes emotions and deep thought. The work of art should have a relation to the viewer. Good art is created and should communicate something knowledgeable. Within the work of art it   self holds deeper meaning. Good art is creativity at its best. You can tell when the artist put their best foot forward. The work is precise, neatly done, and clean. Viewers can't help but to analyze good works of art for long periods of time. When a work of art draws you in, it must be an amazing piece.  Air & Space is an example of a good work of art; at least in my opinion. This piece of work has a strong voice. The bold colors and sharp patterns says so. I love the chaos that appears in this work of art and the contrasting calm  black and white random face. This piece of work is interesting and insightful; it makes me want to see more from the artist. This is good art for me.    

My Baby See's through it all

In my opinion, bad art has no actual meaning. Bad art doesn't necessarily have to be poor in presentation, or structure. Bad art could be neatly done but still  lack creativity and quality. Bad art usual exists when a artist is inspired, rushed, or forced. Bad art doesn't grasp their viewer instantly. Bad art can be simple and it can also have to many ideas that it just doesn't make any sense to the viewer. Bad art could be copies on original pieces,which reduces the value. My Baby See's through it all, is an example of bad art in my opinion. If it wasn't for the tittle I wouldn't be able to grasp the meaning of this piece. It is too dull, and simple for my taste and it does not inspire me at all.